The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given bar chart gives information about typical carbon dioxide (CO2) emission individually in four European countries in the years 1967 and 2007.
In general, it can be seen that the UK and Sweden have the downward trends regarding CO2 emission in metric tonnes, while Italy and Portugal show upward trends for it given the period.
The most remarkable feature was that CO2 emission in Britain accounted for the highest amount throughout the year from 11 tonnes at the beginning of the period to about 9 tonnes in 2017 despite a constant decrease tendency. On the other hand, Sweden emitted the second largest amount of CO2 emissions with nearly 9 tonnes in 1967 and a decade, its figure reached the roughly similar amount of that of UK's. However, since then, CO2 emissions had decreased dramatically to almost 5.8 tonnes in the end.
In contrast, there were opposite patterns from the data given above in remained two countries. Italy and Portugal started at approximately 4.1 tonnes and around 1.8 tonnes respectively. In Italy, its value continued to soar to almost 6.7 tonnes and in 1988, exceeding the data of Sweden, and since 1997, it had remained stable with roughly 7.8 tonnes. In Portugal, discharging CO2 emission per person also rose to 4.8 tonnes in 1997, and since then, its figure had had a plateau.
Overall, although the UK's CO2 emissions had dropped consistently, British people released the most CO2 emissions over the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-28 | fadhiahelbas | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | LIMIAO | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Huy Hoang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | damladogan | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | SaeidAp | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems. 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summ 84
- The governments should invest more money in science education rather than subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electircity 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...nes in 1997, and since then, its figure had had a plateau. Overall, although the UK...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, so, then, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0329218107 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55775800867 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56378600823 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9257692954 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.888888889 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23559693434 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990466262127 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623406300604 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140861958598 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375849406172 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.