When it comes to the topic that giving children weekly money, some people think that parents should allocate their children weekly money, claiming that it is time-effective because kids won't bother them all the time. It seems plausible to say so at the first glimpse. However, it is not convincing enough for me to agree with them. Personally speaking, children are not allowed weekly money.
On one hand, weekly money enables children to foster negative values of money.To be specific, easy access to money leads them to squander money without hesitate, thus hard to cultivate good habit of saving money and putting money on the edge. For instance, my big sister will allocate her son some money every week so he has some freedom to buy whatever he wants. Every weekends he drops by my home, I never fail to find that he has different car mold in his hands. I ask him about his new toy, he says he buys it himself. As we all know, such toys as car molds cannot survive for long time as we might break them without intention. This behavior of spending money without plan would definitely hinder his way to financial independence.
On the other hand, children are likely to have comparison feelings. Generally speaking, we all are tempt to be someone special. If everyone around us own weekly money, we will have a desire to ask our parents to get one as well. If someone have more money than us, we tend to push our parents give us more. This scenario is not uncommon in this modern society and I am no exceptional. When I was a little girl, one of my intimate friends Tina usually got her weekly money which I did not have. When I come back home, I asked my mother to give me some money so that I can buy some learning stuff. One day I found Tina had much more weekly money than mine, with comparison feeling, I, again, pleased my mom to finance me more. During this period, what I harvested is only comparison that has negative impact on children's development.
Admittedly, having some financial freedom could help release parents' burden because they do not have to pay too much attention on what their children need. However, there is an alternative option for parents to give weekly money -- compensate what their children do. For example, young children certainly have the ability to help with some chores like washing dishes, clipping lawn and so forth. By doing so, chances are that they will cherish money they earned, in other words, they will not squander money without hesitate.
To conclude, parents are not supposed to give their children weekly money because it would contribute to negative value of money and comparison feelings. Instead, children can be compensated what they contribute to their family such as doing some chores. Only by this way, can children cultivate important outlook of money and cherish money their parents earned.
- When you are deciding which of the two places to visit, should you:1. Discuss with someone who has visited the two places.2. Read online 76
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What’s your opinion? 70
- Should the government support artists or should artists support themselves? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...dren to foster negative values of money.To be specific, easy access to money leads...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tempted'.
Suggestion: tempted
...eelings. Generally speaking, we all are tempt to be someone special. If everyone arou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... parents to get one as well. If someone have more money than us, we tend to push our...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76458752515 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41055203569 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513078470825 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7162652588 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0769230769 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1153846154 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422185665201 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120697173048 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942933270647 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268693280005 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642251709335 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.