material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers
Both the passage and the lecture discuss material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers. The passage claims that this material were remaining material of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix of dinosaur and provide three evidences for its claim. The professor, in the contrast, throws doubt on the passages claim and denies all of its evidences.
Firstly, the reading considers the branching channels inside the broken leg bone as hollows related to blood vessels and presence of the soft, flexible organic substance inside those channels may are the remaining of the real T.rek's blood vessels. In the contrast, the professor refutes this explanation by saying that those hollows can be related to colonization of bacteria in the death bodies of dinosaurs and other animals and accordingly such soft materials were left by these bacteria.
Secondly, according to reading, it can be thought that the existence of spheres contained vital material of blood cells, iron, revealed by microscopically examination is the remaining of red blood cells. The professor disagrees with this too. He states that this foundation were in the same animals cannot be related to blood cells and the origin of them are from external of their bodies.
Third, the passage said that collagen found during a test, but the lecture refutes this by explaining that collagen cannot remain more than 1000 years. This fact makes a contradiction between this fact and the old of those fossils, 70 million years old fossil. The collagen which reveals during the test is probably from human skin when the researchers touched those bones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | nusybah | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Vivian Chang | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
- declining of population of sea otters 80
- whether or not governments must take improving internet access more weighty than improving public transportation 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life. 73
- the set of 2200 years old clay jars which proposed to be ancient electric batteries 76
- agree or disagree? today young people have better abilities to make decisions than pas young people 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21509433962 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6047414116 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2253661038 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.636363636 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179044698506 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761506284061 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142061787379 0.0662205650399 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10374409781 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909654041066 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.