The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
A glimpse at the two pie charts given compares the changing pattern of average individual spending of the Americans in year 1966 and 1996. All in all, the data differ significantly.
As shown in the information registered in 1966, the spending on food accounting for 44% was in the dominant position in American expenditure. Evidently, second was the expense on cars that accumulated up to approximately one quarter of their overall expenses. By contrast, the spendings on driving, eating out and reading were practically identical at 7%, whereas a meagre 1% of their spendings comprised of the spending on computer.
In stark contrast, in 1996 the US, however, saw its citizens paying doubled cost on buying cars compared to that of three decades ago. Likewise, the overall spending for consuming food in restaurant had doubled over this 30-year period. Noteworthy is the fact that people living in the US spent 10% and 1% on computers and books respectively by 1996.
Overall, the expenses on cars, restaurants and computers increased significant over this period, whereas a plunge was manifested in the sector of food and books.
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it's wiser to marry for money.Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.You should write at least 250 words. 84
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups.Describe the information shown to a university/college lecturer. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, second, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17837837838 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93077671529 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627027027027 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1727678759 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.444444444 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177055705403 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701814305699 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745954764025 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105579963201 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796777775904 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.