Some people think they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe that government should control the use of fresh water as it is limited resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
People have different views to face the growing demand for fresh water. While unlimited using of fresh water is a basic human right, I would argue that there should be regulations by government to restrict the use of fresh water.
On the one hand, freely choosing how much water people can use has several advantages. Firstly, since people have to pay the water fees according to the amount which they use every month, they are responsible for water bills and know how to save money by using water properly. Therefore, they can use fresh water freely like other commodities such as coffee, rice and clothes. Secondly, because tap water is a basic living condition which people have different demands, unlimited water using helps people to do not worry about lack of water for production and individual using. For example, people who are doing farming needs the much larger amount of water for irrigation than an average person does. If the utilization of water is limited, it might have negative impact to stability of society.
On the other hand, I believe that it is beneficial for people when government control the water system. First, as fresh water is a finite resource, mandatory restrictions on water consume rise people’s awareness of saving the water to use in more crucial purposes such as producing food and medicine rather than filling private swimming pool. This allows the government to prevent water exhaustion. Moreover, the increasing number of population leads to the growing demand of water, which causes the shortage of water especially in some parts of the world where are limited supply of fresh water such as Bangladesh, Pakistan and Nigeria. Consequently, the government need to control the fresh water system to ensure that every citizen has equal right to use water regardless of the rich or the poor.
In conclusion, while using water freely is beneficial for people to some extent, I believe limiting the figure for water which each citizens can use by government is a better option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-02 | Khiet Nhi_0609 | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree of disagree 95
- Some people think they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe that government should control the use of fresh water as it is limited resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 73
- Some people believe a high salary is the most important factor when choosing a job Others believe that a good working environment is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People have different views to face the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to restrict the use of fresh water. On the one hand, freely choosing how muc...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive impact to stability of society. On the other hand, I believe that it is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...regardless of the rich or the poor. In conclusion, while using water freely ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03869047619 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55359050664 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1275428758 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.928571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480496415133 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205004345037 0.084324248473 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769102656678 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343332453159 0.151304729494 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506831417423 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.