Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Energy consumption is increasing at a fast rate by the youth of the nation. One such day may come when all the energy resources are depleted. I stand for the notion that there is a need to reduce the energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle. Energy resources include both renewable and non renewable resources. Renewable resources should not get depleted as they are the most vital source of energy.
It is imperative for individuals living in a well developed nation to reduce their energy consumption. It will lead to global warming. Lets take an example of coal which is non renewable energy resource. If coal is burnt, it causes air pollution which may adversely effect the health of the people and the climate too which may cause severe health problems. Sustainable lifestyle refers to a lifestyle which does not harm the environment at any cost. Being myself an individual, it will be very difficult to limit the use of energy as everything is related to it directly. We can use the energy judiciously and avoid unnecessary usage. We are surrounded by things which need energy to work upon. Take for example, my laptop. It requires electric energy to charge its battery.
On the other hand, others believe that sustainable life are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change. They do not guarantee that our efforts of reducing the consumption of energy may improve the current situation of the nation. Its not worth the risk. To lead a sustainable lifestyle, one has to limit the usage of all energy consumption related devices which is absurd in this 21st century. We all are surrounded with electronic devices which play a vital role in our lives. Mobile phones also require energy which comes by charging its battery. Nowadays, Mobile phones are the basic need of an individual on which they cannot give up on. Existing evidence for global climate change could be not authorized.
Hence, we cannot rely only on the statistics provided based on the global climate change, It can make a huge difference to mankind. In my opinion, we should judiciously make use of the energy provided to us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Do you Agree or disagree with following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 60
- Do you Agree or disagree with following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 3
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political t 33
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of WLSS television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the s 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...mption. It will lead to global warming. Lets take an example of coal which is non re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...auses air pollution which may adversely effect the health of the people and the climat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9173553719 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69840300483 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506887052342 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9576561756 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.6538461538 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9615384615 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352506541696 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893016662554 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105195497456 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188016947748 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773995972117 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.