Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion.
It is undeniable fact that technologies have been developing day by day and it has changed the society and lifestyles of people enormously in significant way. While, it is argued that improvements and developments in technologies have been brutal for the society and for people than better. Here i would like to account more advantages than its drawbacks with my own perceptions.
There are manifold points to endorse the magnificent side of technological advancement. First and foremost, a remarkable difference can be seen between todays's communication methods and a few decade ago. To demonstrate, today's communication methods are more efficient and rapid. The development of mobile phones with different applications like messenger, viber, what's app e.t.c. People can make distance communication with their loved ones without face to face contact. As an evidence of this, students who live in abroad for their higher studies can do video calls with their family. They do not feel alone and can have family environment through video calls.
The development of internet makes people life more convenient and efficient. For example, people can delve any topics in the internet related to their works and education. They should not be anxious about any unfamiliar topics.
Despite, the technological advancement has drawbacks too. People using computer consistently can have health problems like back pain, headache and eye problem. In addition to that, people can be caused by obesity problem due to lack of of physical exercises. Because of technological advancement, they should not get out from their room and all necessary things are accessible in their room.
In conclusion, I think technological development has many benefits for people in their study, works and in entertainment too. But it is clear that, using computers can create different health problems. People should take advantages of growing technology in right ways without putting themselves in danger road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-03 | binita karki | 86 | view |
- In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effect on families, individuals and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion 84
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 71
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be seen between todayss communication methods and a few decade ago. To demonst...
^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ent applications like messenger, viber, whats app e.t.c. People can make distance com...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...e caused by obesity problem due to lack of of physical exercises. Because of technolo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5243902439 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97643431199 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5976897188 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10855320399 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426566313097 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384934562329 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714408542147 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289199464705 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.