The table below shows some data regarding Australia's nursing employment and total workforce in 1987 and 2001.
The table provides information about the number of nursing employees and its distribution according to several job positions in Australia. It also compares the total nursing jobs and the total workforce in 1987 and 2001.
In general, the total nursing employment in Australia decreased sunbstantially though the total workforce increased significantly by 37% from year 1987 to year 2001. It can also be noted, with regards to different nursing positions, that the vast majority are assistant nurses whereas the number of Director of nursing boasted the least.
To start with, in year 1987, the total population of nurses working in Australia comprises only one-eighth of the overall laborforce. This figure dropped sharply by 10% or to 161,200 in year 2001 while the total laborers in Australia, iregardless of job position, rose strikingly by 37% which is 3,738,000.
Turning to specific nursing positions, during 1987, morethan half of the total nurses in Australia are assistant nurses (117,000). This is followed by Junior nurses, Senior nurses and Director of nursing having 39,000, 20,000 and, 4,000 of population respectively. Eventually, in 2001, the figure for Assistant nurses, Junior nurses and Senior nurses dropped by 4%, 28% and 20% accordingly, while only the number of Directors of nursing climbed up slightly to 5,200 in total.
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- The table below shows the mothly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?. 84
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, whereas, while, in general, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40758293839 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83516124851 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4430107228 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345940187094 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174376415395 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891988913349 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23973224887 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596027862892 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.