The provided diagrams illustrate the progress of simple cooking utensils in three parts.
This is discernible from the first layout that in earlier times cooking equipment was long with narrow neck and some designs were also present. It was kept on stones with some sticks as fuel. Moving further, in second stage of development it was reduced in height and clay shield on outside was used. However, the fuel utilized was similar to previous, which was stones and few sticks.
It is also apparent from the third figure that in final stage of development cooking equipment was modernized. Metal was used instead of clay and charcoal as fuel. On the upper side handle was there and three supports in inner side. Moreover, inner side was lined with clay and grates for charcoal were present. Whereas, on lower level door was there, for air to enter and ash to leave the utensil.
From overall analysis, it is seen that first two stages were cooking equipment was simple, while, in third advanced material was used.
- Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however feel that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people 78
- Blood sports have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. All blood sports should be banned.Discuss the main arguments for thi 61
- In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that the government should have the responsibility. what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 78
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90173410405 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26322539334 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2950225654 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0909090909 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.07272327761 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035455114767 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046713436879 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664390205257 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385558337969 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.