Recently, the phenomenon of appearing the new technologies that make people able to perform everyday tasks in a far distance and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that doing everyday works without meeting is highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that these technologies can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support using recent technologies in daily works. At first, making people less excersize than before is one disadvantage with the technologies. However, the speed of doing works became faster than before. For example, the finantial activities became faster due to the use of the Internet for banking works insted of standing in a long line.
In addition, depending on technology has made livings more machinery that is very bad for the communities. But, the sue of machinery technologies made work more currect and methiculous. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2018 has shown that a significant number of daily tasks such as business transactions, banking activities and shopping became more accurate by using lates technologies.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on the effects of technology on society, I profoundly believe that despite some disadvantages with affects of technology on people's living, the benefits of technology for the society far outweighed its drawbacks.
- Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
- Some claim that public transport shold be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 77
- The birth rate in most developed countries begins to fall and aging increase. What can be done now to deal with this situation? 77
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 79
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own exp 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of appearing th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rks insted of standing in a long line. In addition, depending on technology has...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t is very bad for the communities. But, the sue of machinery technologies made work mor...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accurate by using lates technologies. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49795918367 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12532613875 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6450927622 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.454545455 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138526014226 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444614500282 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390588704989 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800049790708 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403826441974 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.