In this modern era, people think that regions influence successful person. The sizeable influence of regions influence person success has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. Scholars over a decade have agreed to this phenomenon with credible resources. I agree with the statement of how regions influence people getting success and this will be achieved by creating a pool of empirical evidences to support this topic before attaining a coherent inference.
At the outset, there are diverse approaches why regions influence successful person is considered as dynamic but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that the region provides relationships and social networks. It is quite critical because it helps people's self-development. As an interpretation, investigation reveals that Australian National department provided results in 2007 that around fifty percent of person's influence accompolish by region.
Furthermore, another substantial reason is that people would be surrounded with successful people in a native place.It is deemed substantial because the accomplished people get rich contribute to their native regions. A current survey mentioned that earning money contribute according to their native regions.
Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that not only does increase people self-development but develop confidence level. It can be predicted that in the near future that high people will influence by regions.
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy; some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree, what are the advantages or disadvantages associated with this. 77
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 69
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in theirlife. Agree or disagree. 69
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y creating a pool of empirical evidences to support this topic before attaining a...
^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ith successful people in a native place.It is deemed substantial because the accom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80909090909 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10918394332 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622727272727 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4753989773 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 7.25397266985 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336676183522 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134773274746 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119822217628 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177004980976 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962484486413 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.