Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays educational institutions develop an epitome in field of education. Educational institutions provide education as well as guidance to students. Educational institutes improvise themselves with technical support to understand student’s capability with different test. They are responsible for the student’s life and they work hard for it, but still sometime they are more concerned about their results and future business. I am not agreeing with the statement that educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing field of study in which they are succeed.
There are so many examples which counter the statement, one of them is Michael Jordan, and He was kicked out of his high school basketball team because his sports coach thought he is a poor performer but later on he became to be known as the brightest basketball player of the country. Educational institutes can make someone’s life as well as destroy life.
Secondly, when institution dissuade student from pursuing field of study of their interest then the student may suffer with stress, anxiety, fear and depression. For students teachers or mentors are very important and their words are mean to students, if they said something opposite to their wish in spite of helping to build qualities than students feel lack of self-esteem.
Thirdly, to get succeed in any field combination of aptitude, interest and personality is most important. If a student is not good in science and excellent in math in 10th standard and his personality and interest is based in engineering field then we cannot say he cannot became an engineer. In India the students get subjects only basis of their 10th standard overall grade and no one asked for student’s choice if he or she get low marks. This is not good for student’s future. In India it is also happened sometimes the teachers dissuade students from taking their choice because teachers want to build hundred percent result of class and get incentive award from institution.
Conclusively, Educational institutions play a vital role in students life but it is not good to dissuade or discourage a students from a field instead of to they have to provide better exposure about a field to enhance his qualities and motivate to perform excellent in choose field. Educational institute can make diamond from coal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 59
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 55
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ut their results and future business. I am not agreeing with the statement that educational ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...rsuing field of study in which they are succeed. There are so many examples which co...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
... for student's choice if he or she get low marks. This is not good for student...
^^^
Line 7, column 619, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...r choice because teachers want to build hundred percent result of class and get incenti...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...t is not good to dissuade or discourage a students from a field instead of to they have to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...motivate to perform excellent in choose field. Educational institute can make diamond...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly, well, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28684210526 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03193871221 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8639303342 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5625 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306165170357 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11766882295 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139991152769 0.0758088955206 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175890379699 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115780105952 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.