Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree?
According to some people, the number of boys and girls admitted to any course should be the same. In other words half of the seats should be reserved for male candidates and half should be reserved for female candidates. I do not agree with this view. In my opinion, merit, and not gender, should be the criterion for admission into university programmes.
The argument that the number of boys and girls in each course should be the same is illogical in every aspect. To start with, it shows utter disregard for merit. If seats are reserved on the basis of gender, many meritorious students will fail to get admission. Also, while this move might seem to be an attempt to empower women by increasing their participation in university courses, that really is not the case. Almost every university in the world already admits both boys and girls. In order to secure admission to a university programme of her choice, a girl only has to get good grades. If she waits for reservation to gain admission, it is akin to admitting that her skills are not on par with those of male students.
Another argument against reserving seats on the basis of gender is the difference in the aptitude of men and women. Certain courses like nursing, home science or teaching are more popular among the girls. Likewise, certain courses like engineering and mechanics are more popular among boys. If half of the seats are reserved for boys in a nursing course, chances are many seats will lie vacant. At the same time, many meritorious girls will fail to get admission. Even in courses where both boys and girls have the same aptitude, this arrangement will prevent many deserving candidates from gaining admission just because they belong to the other gender.
To conclude, after analysing various scenarios that might arise from the implementation of this decision, it is not hard to see that reserving university seats on the basis of gender is unwise. It may dilute the quality of education by letting undeserving students in and preventing deserving students from securing admission.
- People are living in a 'throwaway society', using things for a short time and then throwing them away.What are the causes of this?What problems does it lead to? 84
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.https://www.ielts-mentor.com/images/writingsamples/graph-37-visits-to-tw... 61
- People are living in a 'throwaway society', using things for a short time and then throwing them away.What are the causes of this?What problems does it lead to? 78
- People are living in a 'throwaway society', using things for a short time and then throwing them away.What are the causes of this?What problems does it lead to? 84
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'admit'?
Suggestion: admit
...vation to gain admission, it is akin to admitting that her skills are not on par with tho...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, may, really, so, while, as to, in my opinion, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91452991453 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61323301252 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501424501425 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2429601903 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7894736842 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138625801993 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465632030133 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459511771832 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945693032196 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668809159022 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.