Some people believe that students should study in groups. Others think that they should
study alone. What are the benefits of studying in groups and studying alone? Which way is
more effective?
Studying methodologies have been capturing a great deal of public attention due to the ramifications on learners’ academic progress. Although both studying alone and in groups could have many advantages, group learning’s are more pronounced.
On the one hand, there are many benefits when it comes to studying in groups. First, group learning means that individuals with outstanding academic attainments could offset the knowledge insufficiency of those with subpar ones. This would lead to better lession comprehension in lower-level students, acting as an incentive for their making progress. Second, since each student in group have their own perspective towards a particular topic, group studying enables them to exchange ideas, thereby cultivating their critical thinking and idea-conveying skill, which are the most crutial elements in better future employment prospects.
On the other hand, it true that studying alone could have more positve consequences than in groups. First, because group learning consists of many people, which minimises the degree of concentration in each learner, studying alone could reverse that. In fact, this learning method would consequently rise students’ studying productivity and commitment, fueling increased academic attainments. In addition, in comparison with group studying which usually compels individuals to adhere to a specific universal way, self-learning students could study based on their personal preferences. If that is the case, students could feel the convenience and freedom, leading to better academic performances.
In conclusion, I believe studying along offers better efficiency in contrast with styding in groups. Additionally, students should spend more time on self-studying for better academic capacities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-18 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-18 | grahamoneil | 67 | view |
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 56
- In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 38
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits Why How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 76
- Some groups of people have benefited from the modern communications technology but some people have not benefited at all Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...ent prospects. On the other hand, it true that studying alone could have more pos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05882352941 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17032569517 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2492459174 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33617310861 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132763586516 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074409573476 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214747568007 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512987796141 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.