In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passage about the benefits of smart cars. She states that there is not clear evidence that smart cars benefit people in terms of saving life and saving their money and less commuting time.
First of all, although the author states the smart cars prevent many accidents and hence save lives, the lecturer refutes this claim. She states somehow some accidents happen and these cars fail occationally. Also,due to more packed driving together, many more cars involve in the accident andso they can not save life and reduce injery.
Moreover, the professor claimes increased speed in highway does not necessarily lead to reduce commuting time. In fact, when people feel driving is convenient they use more cars and more drive due to easier driving makes more traffic due to additional cars.
Lastly, the speaker opposses to the idea of decrease in the cost of driving. She says global positioning system is very expensive and also other costly technology is needed for maintaining these cars. Therefore, the repair expense of these cars are more than offset of traditional cars. This idea is in contrast to the claim of author that smart car need less repair. In fact, their repair is more expensive eventhough they need less repair due to using more direct routs.
- In this set of material the reading and the listening passages are discussing the Altruism, given explanation of this term and examples to support the main idea. Nevertheless, the reading and the listening passage are completely contradictory. In fact, wh 3
- tpo-1 integrated writing; 3
- Franchises benefits 81
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some t 3
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , due
...n and these cars fail occationally. Also,due to more packed driving together, many m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, in contrast, in fact, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9525862069 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31165926967 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5437043068 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.75 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155039982039 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596138730782 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423208847415 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914985458711 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190647938071 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.