The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates the figure for 3 sources of air pollutants measured in the UK during the period 1990 to 2005.
It is clear that there was an upward movement in the total number of air pollutants in the UK over the 15- year period. Furthermore, the decline in air pollutants from industry sources was particularly significant.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 1990, the total amount of air pollutants was exactly 7 million tonnes in the UK. After 9 years there was a significant decrease in the total number of air pollutants to figure for approximately 4 million tonnes and then continued to fall to about 3 million tonnes in 2005.
As illustrated, in 1990, industry sources accounted for roughly 5 million tonnes in the number of air pollutants in the UK, compared to just under a million tonnes from both transport and household. In 1996, the total amount of industry sources reached the 3 million tonnes mark, which was nearly triple as high as that for transport( around 1million tonne). At the end of the period, the air pollutants did not change position in relation to each other as industry sources accounted for 2 million tonnes, following by a million tone from transport and under a haft of a million tone from household.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-17 | dnnghha | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | minhihi1501 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Vo Long | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | Thang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-11 | Khakimova KhA | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010 81
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the UK during the period 1990 to 2005. It is clear that there was an upward mov...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80365296804 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76242499401 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470319634703 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1761234298 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203170376033 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122237257493 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553364826016 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157730509304 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031944724508 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.