Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give advantages of both and your point of view.
Opinions differ as to whether schools should split the children’s vacation into multiple short ones or continue to give single but long period. I believe offering short vacations is the better idea.
It is understandable why people say that children should be given one long vacation. One reason is that pupils will have more time for their activities seemlessly without worrying about their studying. Whether children choose to spend this time with their classmates at schools or with their family at home, they are assured a long period to enjoy themselves without the interruption of homeworks and assignments from teachers. This also allows the young to prepare thoroughly for the next academic year. In Vietnam, for example, most public and private schools grant their students a 3-month vacation in the summer, in which children use for relaxation and preparation for the next year.
However, I side with those who think that schools should divide a long vacation into smaller chunks during the semesters. One reason to support my standpoint on this matter is that, with short term vacations, pupils will be able to recharge their energy for studying one lesson after another. Knowing that continuous studying is fairly exhausting for most children, short vacations help them organize what is learnt to absorb new information in class. Furthermore, children who have a 3-week break at the end of the year are more likely to remember last year’s lessons. Because the lessons of one grade is usually linked to the previous, children will be able to learn faster with a reduced revision time.
In conclusion, I assert that short vacations during an academic year is more beneficial than one long vacation for the school children although both have their own advantages. After all, the purpose of either option is to offer the pupils a time for recharging themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | Jipsajadwani | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | phpcody | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-27 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
- The unlimited use of cars may lead to many problems. What are these problems? In order to reduce these problems, people should be discouraged from using cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- You are staying in rented accommodation. You recently held a party to celebrate your birthday. Several neighbors have complained about the noise to your landlord. Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter:•Apologize for the disturbance•Explain t 73
- You are traveling and need someone to do you a favor while you are gone Write a letter asking a neighbor or friend for help In your letter include Where you are going What the favor is Why you need this friend to help 83
- Writing task 1 the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Television dominates the free-time for too many people. It can make people lazy and prevent them from socializing with others. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether schools should split the children'...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, after all, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17320261438 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6528481032 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571895424837 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3281121943 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268925709889 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107225439098 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101210064864 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194077623512 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823273624073 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.