Newspapers have an enormous influence on people’s opinions and ideas. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative situation?
Information on newspapers has been utilized effectively in recent years. Some people think that this source of information has a great effect on individuals’ point of views. There is a reason for this statement. However, I believe such development could have a negative influence on the readers.
To begin with, there is a certain reason why many viewers believe that newspapers have changed people’s way of thinking. In the century of industrializing where newly discovered innovation is published on newspapers every day, people are able to approach new ideas daily. Consequently, getting exposed to newspapers continuously will result in replacing the people’s outdated concepts in various aspects with updated ones, which enormously change individuals’ opinions and ideas. For instance, older people, who mostly support the conventional education, are now more opened to home school technology thanks to reading many explanation and proving evidences provided by newspapers. Thus, it is no doubt to state that newspapers can drastically change people’s point of views.
Unfortunately, the readers are at risk of taking false and covered information when being exposed too much to newspapers. Firstly, in the days of profit-oriented business, newspapers are paid to push a huge amount of advertisement with incorrect details of products intentionally to catch the consumers’ attention. The consequence of such information is the decrease of viewers’ credibility when they decide to share with the others. Secondly, although private publishers have the rights to handle their own materials, governments might interfere in some circumstances with false political articles to misguide the citizens. For examples, propagandas and disingenuous information written by governments can be easily found on every private newspaper to brainwash the citizens. Therefore, relying too much on newspapers could damage people’ originally genuine opinions and ideas.
In conclusion, while reading newspapers brings a change to the way individuals think, I believe this development could have some harmful impacts on the viewers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-24 | janakmandaviya | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | drtruong92 | 85 | view |
| 2017-07-10 | lauranguyen | 72 | view |
- Your local newspaper wants to reward people who have contributed a lot to the community.Write a letter to the newspaper. In your letter:suggest someone who deserves the reward.mention what they have done to help the community.say what reward you would lik 73
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 91
- The environment problem facing today’s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Governments and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To wh 84
- Many people are now opting to provide technology companies with their personal data in exchange for access to software Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun explanation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many explanations'.
Suggestion: many explanations
...ome school technology thanks to reading many explanation and proving evidences provided by newsp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89171974522 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4034738466 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601910828025 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2734715643 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273490866602 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086387327356 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719611265549 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157427763955 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524711222828 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.