It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South Pole.
Nowadays, scientists and tourists choose to explore the distant natural environment. Among breathtaking places in the world, the south pole has become a proper destination to people. In my opinion, this has more drawbacks than benefits.
There will be some advantages for visitors and examiners. Many experiments are conducted by researchers to acknowledge the feature of this zone like analyzing snow level to recognize an increasing temperature of the earth. Moreover, tourists will have a fascinating adventure travel when they have an opportunity to witness the signature weather or penguin in the South Pole. People cannot resist traveling to an appealing place such as the unique phenomenon only occur in the South Pole which is Aurora. As a result, it will expand the economy of countries in this area and support the habitats to ameliorate their livings.
On the other hand, there are substantial disadvantages of this development. The greatest problem is the contamination. The more people come, the more trash is littered, and the ecology is facilitated to destruction. For example, the plastic bag is utilized by people that cannot be recycled. It leads to the greenhouse effect which triggers to the increased temperature on the earth. Another drawback is that the territories of the animals are damaged. If the number of people comes to the South Pole keep increase, it will become an attractive place for investors to gain more profits from the business. For instance, the enterprises will construct some luxury resorts to appeal to the tourists. In order to do that they must use a massive area, the living area of animals is altered by this.
In conclusion, although there are some conveniences, the advantages are outweighed by disadvantages. Because of the pollution and destruction which are caused by people
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be share freely. Discuss both these views and gi 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant. 78
- The users of social media like facebook or twitter are replacing face to face contact to this century. Do you think its advantages are outweighed by its disadvantages? 84
- Some people state that parents have the most essential role in a child’s development. However, others argue that TV or friends are the most significant influence. Discuss both view and state your opinion. 56
- In recent years farming practice has changed to include methods such as factory farming and the use of technology to improve crops Some people believe these developments are necessary while others regard them as dangerous and advocate a return to more tra 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d destruction which are caused by people
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25510204082 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00132824191 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5017260894 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3157894737 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201730693147 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501877403509 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736704573808 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114175849776 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824844512927 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.