The line graph represents the number of information about international conferences hosted in three different types of capital cities (citiy A,citiy Band citiy C) in year between 1980 and 2010.
In 1980, there were 35 international conferences in city A. Compared to 30 in citi B. Despite both cities A and B has fall down to 30 and less than 25 conferences respectively. With the smiliar fluctuations in 2005. They again dipped to 27 conferences. City B has overtaken city A at the end of year with 26 and 24 conferences accordingly.
City C had no international conferences in 1980. However, it was view 20 international conferences in 1980. It has gradually arise up to 35 conferences in 2000 and again decreased to 30 conferences in 2010
Overall, it is clear that cityA and CityB has decline the number of international conferences throughout the period. In contrast, cityA has rapid increase in the conferences until the year 2005
- The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.Units: per 100 inhabitants 56
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant. 73
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary. 67
- the chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 73
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students judge right and wrong and to behave well. Some say that teachers should only teach students about acacdemic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , citiy
...ifferent types of capital cities citiy A,citiy Band citiy C in year between 1980 and 2...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear between 1980 and 2010. In 1980, there were 35 international conferences ...
^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uations in 2005. They again dipped to 27 conferences. City B has overtaken city A...
^^
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...l conferences in 1980. It has gradually arise up to 35 conferences in 2000 and again...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has gradually arise up to 35 conferences in 2000 and again decreased to 30 confer...
^^
Line 8, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verall, it is clear that cityA and CityB has decline the number of international...
^^
Line 8, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clear that cityA and CityB has decline the number of international conferences ...
^^
Line 8, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...id increase in the conferences until the year 2005
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27474005813 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.5915740262 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.6363636364 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3636363636 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325433982453 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127340533234 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097148923754 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199114558122 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787415036402 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.