People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of building an advanced transportation system and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of modern transportation facilities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that public commuting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, a developed transportation system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of reducing the air pollution as well as the traffic jam, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered subways and trains are the safest vehicles. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both carpooling and improving public buses apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, building new road for vehicles might increase the consequences of overcrowding. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the accident risk could relate to this reality that the demerits of using private cars pertain to traffic congestion. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of false transport strategies is correlated negatively with fatalities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of traffic free-zone.

To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the pros of providing an advance transportation system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of public safety prove the significance of traffic restraint policies, but also pinpoint saving time of citizens implications.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 Alireza.r.68 85 view
2019-12-27 yasamin.gharib62 85 view
2019-07-10 viviana 72 view
2019-06-11 Nasir-RZN 88 view
2019-05-11 zjaved 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user brandnewiman :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66367713004 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30518523413 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67264573991 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8052206099 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.3 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146847124995 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525638763164 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738174423076 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888125545496 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294752053163 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.