Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that the automobile has more disadvantages than its advantages. In my opinion, I agree with first group but not totally.
First of all, the cars can cause many enviromental and healthy problems. To according researches from over the world, there is a good deal of evidence that increasing car use is contributing to global warming and having other undesirable effects on people’s health and well-being. For example, gases consisting of CO2, CH4, SO2, CFC are the most sourses making greenhouse effect. All of it have an important role to raising the global temperature. Besides, macro dusts that are smaller than feathers of respiratory tract can cause many dangerous diseases if it isn’t filtered. Therefore, we need to use a mask to avoid these.
Secondly, the cars accounts for more than 50% of transport accidents, especially second hand ones. Although the government limits the amount of owning private car and controls the quanlity of cars, there are many car accidents occuring daily. More cars are on the road, more collisions happen. For this reason, decreasing the quantity of having private cars and using more public bus can solve this issuse.
On the other hand, cars still get its advantages that another transports don’t have. It’s a convinience. For instance, people can have absolute freedom on deciding the schedule and roads to reach their destination. In a car, a person does not have to worry about the dust, noise and fumes present in the road while in public transportation it is not always possible to avoid those.
In conclusion, there are some automobile disvantages excisting, but we can’t deny its advantages. Thus, our mission is solving the raised issuses to limit the bad effects of having cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | Prabhp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Prabhp | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | pawanchopra000 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | Jinu Benny | 73 | view |
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development? 84
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away Causes and problems 87
- Education for young people is important in many countries . However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (CFC) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... gases consisting of CO2, CH4, SO2, CFC are the most sourses making greenhouse effe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83577475152 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3995606696 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231812534304 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744923509123 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879723815788 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142160363603 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839597906431 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.