The bar chart compares male and female drivers in terms of car trips by eight different purposes in 2005.
Overall, it is apparent from the given figure that the main purpose of driving was work for everyone, while the least indication was visiting friends by 2005. Moreover, in the most occasions, percentage of women trips higher than men, except work, going to countryside and amusement.
Regarding the women, almost 40% of reason why they drive cars was going to work, being less than men rates by approximately 10%. The second highest was shopping as opposed to almost half of men. Courses, bank, meeting friends and running errands similarly accounted for around 10%, whereas visiting towns and recreation were under5%. The second highest
Half of the objection to drive car was work for men and travelling towns and leisure time were under and over 10% respectively. These three features were higher than women trend in 2005, while other purposes considerably lower than female drivers.
- The diagram below shows how salt is removed from sea water to make it drinkable. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 78
- The rise of convenience food has helped people keep up with the speed of modern life.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reation were under5%. The second highest Half of the objection to drive car was w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1472392638 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45194700423 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.054343459 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142427526856 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712855291071 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104115599567 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123490270018 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125871549726 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.