Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a very significant argue about to use which sources while doing a research. Most of the researchers prefer to use printed materials such as books and articles. However, in my opinion, internet is more useful than the printed materials from so many perspectives. We will discuss about it in the following statements.
First of all, to find the whatever a researcher wants is simpler in internet than the printed materials. You can write the key words on the research engine and after a few clicks you will be found so many sources. Additionally, you can check the reliability of the sources as well by researching it by using internet. However, you may not able to do that by using a just printed materials. If that book is written by using plagiarism, how can you aware of it? You need to check the other books as well. This is a very common problem in Turkey. So, this situation makes internet more reliable and useful than printed materials.
Secondly, the printed materials have huge costs to read them. To print them on a paper we need to cut so many trees. Obviously, the source of the paper is forests. To increase the printed materials life amount, the paper must be made by using qualified paper. Besides that, to make these printed books more reachable the amount should be increased. All these means using more trees. Despite all this work, the fee of the printed books is still so expensive for researchers, Turkey can be an instance for that. Because of this reason, researchers want to use internet for their researches, not expensive, not damageable for the nature and world. This is another reason to use internet instead of printed materials.
Finally, even though there are still some researchers claim using printed materials are better than internet-based ones. Because of the accessibility, reliability and the fee issue internet-based materials are more common for the researchers. This can be called as natural selection. At the end, using internet is better than the printed materials for researchers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | skmsamu | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | kathishivaram | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Afruzi | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Modern life is easier than life in the past.Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... about to use which sources while doing a research. Most of the researchers prefer to use ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: KEY_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keywords'?
Suggestion: keywords
...he printed materials. You can write the key words on the research engine and after a few ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'material'?
Suggestion: material
...able to do that by using a just printed materials. If that book is written by using plagi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able and useful than printed materials. Secondly, the printed materials have hug...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...per is forests. To increase the printed materials life amount, the paper must be made by ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94476744186 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78170638525 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491279069767 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0382919608 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.04 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.76 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402554767262 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131697900822 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095827911763 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286168098775 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590028911462 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.