Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of paying more to professional workers and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a high salary can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, job profit can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, entertaining people might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with a vital issue. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of collaborating with society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues potential implications
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and should be oaid more than sport and entertainment personalities.to what extend do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70711297071 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28421233546 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694560669456 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9096359237 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064926489339 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023023864339 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025337152084 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359249269345 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170073511908 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.15 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.