These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems.
People in some parts of the world are said to adopt a “throw-away” lifestyle, which leads to the short duration of usage. Therefore, it is claimed that this phenomenon stems from several causes and there will be undoubtedly some negative consequences.
Two main factors are worthy of consideration when it comes to the reasons for this living trend. First, it is the negative peer pressure that manipulates people to follow this trend. In particular, in some a group of youngers, a member will be ostracized if he or she cannot catch up with the up-to-date fashion or technological trends. As a result, in order to integrate into these modern communities, young generations have to alter their styles such as replacing old clothes or technological devices with the latest ones. Second, with the development of technology, items are manufactured at ease into different shapes and colors, which leads to the reduction of the price. Therefore, consumers can throw old things to try some items of different colors and models.
In terms of outcomes, this phenomenon exerts several disadvantages related to waste disposal and the environment. To begin with, the more prevalent this trend is, the more trash and refuses are discarded to the landfill, which causes the place to handle an excessive amount of garbage. This imposes burdens of subsidizing national budget to waste solution on governments. Furthermore, when the influx of disposal is present, hazardous chemicals used to produce items would be increased and damage the environment. For instance, if people dispose of batteries from phones in large number, the amount of mercury- the main components of batteries will be accelerated to an alarming level that is detrimental to the natural habitats.
In conclusion, the extravagant lifestyle and the technological era are to blame for the throw-away phenomenon. This trend also has two major drawbacks affecting the action of managing waste and environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-03 | kayra | 91 | view |
| 2020-12-03 | kayra | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-13 | Limeluminous | 87 | view |
| 2018-10-13 | Limeluminous | 74 | view |
| 2018-10-13 | Limeluminous | 89 | view |
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things. What is your opinion? 89
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe that there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The chart below compares levels of recycling as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management in fifteen European countries 87
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 89
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...me parts of the world are said to adopt a 'throw-away' lifestyle, which...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndoubtedly some negative consequences. Two main factors are worthy of considera...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... items of different colors and models. In terms of outcomes, this phenomenon ex...
^^^
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is detrimental to the natural habitats. In conclusion, the extravagant lifestyle...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35350318471 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16279880482 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.533037299 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.066666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195580455173 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061958947197 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093360733833 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134086842411 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103251500109 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.