Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people have a belief that information should be shared as much as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world whereas others reckon that some knowledge is too pivotal or too valuable to be shared without costs. Both the opinions will be analyzed in this essay along with my opinion.
On the one hand, it is perceived that information about science, business or academy should be public on over the world. Indeed, if people share knowledge with each other, they can improve themselves by learning from the others. Besides, they might find out solutions for their problems which they have no idea before. For example, successful entrepreneurs share the ways to reduces production expenses so that new companies learn from them and run business more productively.
On the other hands, it is maintained that some studies are too vital to be shared freely. It is clear that researchers have spent a lot of time and expenses on their studies. As a result, they have the copyrights for their researches and those who want to use them need to pay fees for the researchers. For instance, a doctor did a study for 10 years with a lot of money so we have to pay money to read his study. Besides, it is important to consider which information could be popular because these studies can be used in wrong ways which might cause damages for societies. For example, DNA researches need to be controlled by the governments because some people can use them for illegal purposes.
In conclusion, I am inclined to support the latter opinion due to aforementioned analysis on that viewpoint.
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 74
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Topic: Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89010989011 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71403112112 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5850166462 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.692307692 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308537688661 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109654542214 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143114816603 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184346159494 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162370691979 0.056905535591 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.