Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.
Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach you own conclusion on which side you favor.
It would seem that these days smoking cigarettes in social spaces is banned in numerous countries, whereas this regulation has not been enforced fully in other nations. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, supporters of forbidding smoking tobacco publicly claim that there are many vulnerable non-smokers such as women and children in working places or cafes, and these people’s health may suffer significantly if they inhale certain amount of smoke from cigarettes. Such laws, in fact, might reduce the realistic possibility of this situation, thus preventing such people from passive smoking. Furthermore, proponents of enacting a law against smoking point to evidence from Bangkok, Thailand where citizens or tourists who flout this law are punished heavily. This may potentially protect the atmosphere at these places, thus deterring numerous people from being exposed to second hand smoke.
On the other hand, opponents of banning smoking in public buildings insist that some jobs require a lot of employees’ attention which could be gained by smoking cigarettes. It is notable, for example, that DJs who usually work under high pressure in night clubs tend to smoke cigarettes in order to keep focused. Moreover, those who oppose regulations on smoking say that it is a widely-observed fact that smoking chambers in public buildings are increasingly common. This might allow people to smoke without having severe effects on others’ health and well-being.
In conclusion, I would tend to side with proponents of banning smokers in social spaces, as it seems logical to put more effort into protecting the public health and lowering the risk of being second hand smokers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | angellica | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | ahmadrava88 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | nguyenana611 | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | nguyenana611 | 78 | view |
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity How far do you share this viewpoint 92
- All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. ‘How far do you agree with this proposal?’ 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 84
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations. 84
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend, and propose some solutions you think would be effective. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38686131387 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81621315411 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4707063589 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.181818182 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218469153304 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838331638151 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373825879677 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115494329706 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525561665721 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.