Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones.
Why is this happening?
What problems may it lead to?
With the advent to technology and globalisation, the lifestyle of people is changing abruptly. Now-a-days, a new trend has seen in which they replace the broken items in their proximity with the new ones. They do not give a single thought to repair as they believe it will be time consuming. This new trend is circulating at faster rate and I believe that this is happening due to economical, social and moral reasons.
Economically, due to industrialisation, prices of things are lowered as compared to last decade and their purchasing power has been increased. For instance, Smartphones were launched with the price of hundred of thousands while now they can be purchased in hundreds only. This drop in price tag helped people to buy more products. Morally, people are disconnected from the other people as well as for their things. They do not have feelings and emotions with the products they own, resultantly, whenever defect occur in such items they immediately replace them with the new models available in the market. Socially, after purchasing new models, they brags about them and maintain their fake images.
Admittedly, this new trends has plethora of secluded effects on our planet. Plenty of products produce harmful rays and their is proper criteria for their disposal, however, this is not followed and are directly exposed to our environment leading to the deterioration of it. Apart from that, in order to make new products, a lot of minerals are digged and during manufacturing water is wasted which is not used again. The results of later are seen clearly as water in Noida is now not fit for drinking without proper treatment.
In retrospection, it is evidently clear that this new trend is not fit for our environment and new rules should be passed so that people adopt to repair the old products.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- First impression is the last impression. Some people believe that if you give a good interview, chances are high that you may get selected for the job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computer, television and art phones this is very harmful to them. To what extent do you agree. 78
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 73
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'brag'
Suggestion: brag
...ally, after purchasing new models, they brags about them and maintain their fake imag...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ty of products produce harmful rays and their is proper criteria for their disposal, ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...w rules should be passed so that people adopt to repair the old products.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, apart from, as for, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97712418301 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.809775339 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5361841103 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.533333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214504561982 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706638300891 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463791118503 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129939883616 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046206511587 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.