Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowledge has become one of the most important factor that drives a person to success. Also, there are some arguments on whether universities organize and support the social activities and sports events as equal to the academic lessons and libraries. I think a university is a place to educate people, not to support them as a person and encourage them to socialize. Because the main duty of the university is to encourage people academically, not to make them socialize or help them to be healthy.
To begin with, it is the responsibility of students to keep them healthy, not the universities'. Most university students are capable of their health and social life because most of them are aged above sixteen. Moreover, students have plenty of leisure time to take care of themselves and it is way better to provide them with an information of being healthy to help them to be informed in the future. From my personal experience, I am planning to study abroad when I graduate and all the works come to my responsibility, not others. Because of that, my parents teach me a real-life lesson and share their personal experience about how to being healthy or socialize.
Furthermore, not all students have the same interest that causes a problem for the university to support every student equally. Some people enjoy going to the gym to exercise while others prefer to run only in the morning to keep fit with their size. Also, if the university supports the social events with much money, the students would concentrate more on it that distract them from learning. Maybe some of them change their university in order to get more high-qualified academic knowledge from other universities. I think this situation has many cons for both students and the university.
All in all, in my opinion, the disadvantages of the financial support on the sports and social events just like the academic once outweigh the pros of it. I believe that it is enough for students to learn about their major deeply throughout the years they learn in a university.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-26 | AliOmar | 76 | view |
2020-01-23 | King harald | 80 | view |
2020-01-20 | Barana | 76 | view |
2020-01-09 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 73 | view |
2020-01-07 | FarhadEbrahimi | 60 | view |
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgets on expensive medical technology and procedures.This money should be spent/ instead on health education to keep people well.To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 57
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, i think, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88793103448 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81494669417 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6353911452 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148031350719 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541925900838 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562111348581 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100563671424 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416814677339 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.