The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates information of production and consumption of US energy between 1950 to 2025.

At a glance , it is observed that the striking factor being trend of projected overall enhancement in production and consumption of energy in US. While, 25 quadrillion of energy were consumed and produced in US in 1950. However, consumption and production of US energy were increased by 1975. Almost, 60 quadrillion of energy were produced and consumed by US in 1975. Besides this, almost 90 quadrillion of energy were consumed by US in 2000 as well as consumption of energy were almost 30 qua...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 9.4 (6 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rgy between 1950 to 2025. At a glance , it is observed that the striking factor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, moreover, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1038961039 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08057591545 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8888562091 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251417091072 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139487967945 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615833226421 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225236644375 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623424042605 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.