In order to stay healthy, many people choose to exercise. Some people
tend to exercise individually such as running and riding bicycles, etc.
Some people tend to participate in group exercises such as team sports.
Which one do you prefer and why
From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that doing exercises has played a significant and inevitable role in health condition of individuals’ life. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that participating in team sports in order to exercise is more enjoyable and more beneficial since they can meet new people, and so it helps them to be more sociable. Some others, nevertheless, take an opposite point and hold the view that exercising individually is a better choice. I am personally inclined to the former view. I cling to this viewpoint for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
One of the reasons coming to mind at first is that participating in groups in order to exercise leads individuals to learn how to cooperate well with others. It is worth mentioning that the more people learn how to coordinate with others, the better and more convenient social life they have. An example of my own drives this fact home. I remember when I was a senior student at the university, I participated an aerobic class just to enjoy. As time passes, I abruptly felt that I became more sociable and I could make connections with other people more readily as compared to my previous disposition. Had I not attended in that class in order to exercise in a group, I would not have been able to live as sociable as I am now. This example manifests how participating in a group for doing such an activity leads individuals to live a better social life and have better connections with others.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating my stance is that joining groups for exercising makes people to enjoy exercising more. To be more specific, we as a human being need to be sociable and interact with others, and I am sure that everybody loves to do the same activity with other peoples. Consequently, people who do the activity in a group feel less tired and fresher in the long run. My own example is a compelling example of this. As I remember, when I was a high school student, I went two days a week to gym with one of my friends. I understood the more I talk to her during my exercising, the less I felt tired after the activity. This story clearly illustrates how exercising as a team sports makes individuals enjoy it more and feel healthier.
To put it in a nutshell, by taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I firmly believe that exercising in groups is a better idea. I feel this way because not only do this idea help people to learn how to cooperate with others well, but also it makes them enjoy exercising more. It is highly recommended that a survey will be conducted to assess what other profound impacts exercising as a team may have on individuals’ morale and life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-28 | pershin_sh | 73 | view |
- pterosaurs 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
- In order to stay healthy, many people choose to exercise. Some peopletend to exercise individually such as running and riding bicycles, etc.Some people tend to participate in group exercises such as team sports.Which one do you prefer and why 73
- When giving feedbacks to students some teachers would like to talk to their students in person while some teachers would give written comments to students Which do you prefer and why 87
- Some people prefer to live in the country. Others prefer to live in the town or big cities. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68282828283 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90729742695 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468686868687 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1189657947 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21721976255 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680277607385 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527886938665 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149107086377 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119653562568 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.