Some people claim that instead of having to prepare for huge number of exams in schools, children should learn more. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Use your own experience to support your ideas.
Recently, the huge number of exams in schools has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " are exams a practical form of students assessments?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that schools exams do not assess students correctly. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, written exams are bound up inextricably with academic assessments, which indicates they lead to both educational systems and evaluating pupils. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2013 demonstrates the relationship between cognitive skills and learning processes as well as an exponential increase in low performances. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of traditional tests is correlated positively with not only prepared papers but also being the fair and accurate examination.
Within the realm of sociopsychology, without the slightest doubt, regular exams attribute to anxiety, in that it would come down to depression, cheating and severe stress. A salient example of such attribution is nervous disorders, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take assessment pressure for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint schools strategies problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to self-confidence, tensional environment and even acquiring knowledge. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of systematic exams in student's personalities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analysing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that new form of examinations can help students to learn more at schools. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-29 | brandnewiman | 77 | view |
- Some people claim that instead of having to prepare for huge number of exams in schools, children should learn more. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Use your own experience to support your ideas. 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience is it a positive development? 85
- The time people devote in jobs leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 85
- The cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. How realistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 77
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al form of students assessments?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that schools ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...cognitive skills and learning processes as well as an exponential increase in low ...
^^
Line 8, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analysing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74324324324 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33117701742 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682432432432 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3992462441 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137459702606 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371662652955 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025213497246 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746667370763 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228356659621 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.