Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
It is always better for students to have autonomy over choosing subjects to study hence, I believe that universities should not mandate the students to select courses that are out of their interested field because this might result in waste of resources and time. Furthermore, students might not perform well in those subjects which ensues in deplorable grades that might affect their overall grades. Also, in the worst-case scenario, this poor performance might cause depression to them which is very bad.
Firstly, if students have been started studying irrelevant subjects, they have been wasting their time and resources if these subjects do not have any connection to their fields and if they spend that time on the subjects pertinent to their fields then, they could improve their knowledge.
Secondly, for suppose, if a student did score badly in an impertinent subject then, his/her overall grades decrease. This will not be the case if they choose subjects relevant to their field of interest. Additionally, I have seen some of my friends who had suffered from depression because of bad performances in irrelevant subjects.
However, some may argue that, learning other subjects not relating to one’s field of interest is quite beneficial as this leads to diversification of knowledge, citing the paper on Bulb by Edison who used his knowledge of philosophy in presenting his thesis that earned him reputation as an inventor of bulb however, Tesla was the one who invented it first but failed to present this quickly on a paper as he had knowledge of physics only, unlike Edison. But these are very few number of cases where knowledge from other irrelevant subjects was required. So, in general, it is better to stick to relevant subjects.
In conclusion, as there might be waste of time and resources, poor performances in irrelevant subjects which may cause depression and it is not required to have knowledge of impertinent subjects in general, It is better to give students latitude in selecting their courses, not universities.
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Photographers who work in color have an advantage over those who work in black-and-white. 66
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses. Last year, however, all of the five best-selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin. Furthermore, a recent 41
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 63
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 479, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...only, unlike Edison. But these are very few number of cases where knowledge from other irr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecting their courses, not universities.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18318318318 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80010666835 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51951951952 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.929941382 60.3974514979 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.909090909 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2727272727 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 5.21951772744 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136830210874 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541000404629 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648396227365 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819475473378 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474272205304 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.