Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years.
The pie charts compare the percentage of five categories of energy production in France between 1995 and 2005. From a general perspective, different trends could be observed, all categories had an increase except the Petro over the period.
It is evident from the information provided that Coal had the highest percentage of energy production at 29.8%, followed by Gas and Petro. In contrast, Nuclear and Other were the lowest in comparison with others, at 6.4% and 4.9% respectively.
During the next ten years, Coal and Gas made up the largest proportion at just over 60% of energy production, in which Coal was still at the top at 30.93%. Gas also experienced a gradual growth by about 1%, while Petro witnessed a significant reduction from 29.27% to 19.55% in the percentage of energy production. Meanwhile. Nuclear and Other both rise slightly but still slow compared with the other categories and remained at the bottom of the proportion of energy production at the end of the time period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Mtanh | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Mtanh | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-02 | vdnguyen3012 | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | lala nguyen | 73 | view |
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present 59
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for a children s future 83
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before. What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...in the percentage of energy production. Meanwhile. Nuclear and Other both rise slightly b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03614457831 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79195909066 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0211844622 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226480395552 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105671764047 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676408365195 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150975717156 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217781027065 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.