The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The chart illustrates information about the average emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) per capita in four countries the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in forty years from 1967 to 2007.
In general, it is clear to see that there was a general decrease in CO2 emissions in metric tonnes in the United Kingdom and Sweden between 1967 and 2007, while Italy and Portugal experienced a significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions.
In 1967, the United Kingdom was the highest country of CO2 emissions in metric tonnes with nearly 11 tonnes. Following this, the figure for carbon dioxide emissions fell remarkably each year, as a result in 2007 the number of carbon dioxide emissions was around 9 tonnes. Similarly, Sweden one of the top regions had the highest emissions at over 8 tonnes in 1967 and dropped dramatically to nearly 5 tonnes in 2007. Exceptionally, the time period from 1967 to 1977 this figure rose considerably to over 10 tonnes.
In contrast, both Italy and Portugal witnessed a noticeable rise in carbon dioxide emissions from over 4 and 1 ton to over 6 and 4 tonnes respective in forty years. Nevertheless, between 1997 and 2007 this figure unchanged in Italy.
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for a children s future 83
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 89
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, similarly, while, in contrast, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7358910797 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7677695189 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412457052653 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188765725493 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121423398642 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293461715641 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931478076327 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.