Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
I'm against the claim that teacher's salary should be based on their student's academic perfomance. I've plenty of reasons to support my claim. Education is not should be the money oriented domain, but day today it is emerging as one. Education should focus on learning and teaching, but rather it became more inclined towards buying and selling.
One fundamental problem with the claim is evaluation of student's perfomance. The issue of evaluating the perfomance is not new, many have tried and developed many tools, like IQ tests, psychological tests, physical strength tests. When it comes to accept one method as standard of basis, then they all fail. The domain difference is also a hinderence in measuring one's true perfomance, how can a student of litrature score good in exam of science. It is also important that one chooses the domain in which he is sound, and this part causes major pain. Without unbias evaluation there is no way to justify that the salary is propotionate to the perfomance of students.
Getting salary based on the perfomance of student's might kill teacher's enthusiasm towards creativity. No more picnics, no more field visits, no more free days, no more talent sharing competitions. The aim of the education is to learn something new, find something beyond the current reach of human minds. World's top creative minds like Newton, Da Vinci, Aristotal had some motivation to go beyond others and one way or the other their teachers have contributed to it.
Educators will now focus on how the students will get good score. Try and fail scheme will be obsolete, no one will challange the beliefs, inventive minds will be humiliated. Teacher's will enroll students with good record and more students will go to places where they can get other quality students and education market will become a stock market. This will break society apart, same as economical status there will be heirarchy of education and heirarchy of educational institutions.
In summation providing salaries based on student's perfomance will do more harm then good. Although I'm not completely ignoring the fact that it might help some good tutors to come forth but over all impact will be negative. One thing might implemented is to provind special bonuses to the teachers with good perfomance record of students if they are earning comparitively lesser amount.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | ajonna | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Usama148 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | wenye | 50 | view |
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 66
- Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society would be better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that will ultimately have the most long-term significance. 79
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 66
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
Im against the claim that teachers salary ...
^^
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
Im against the claim that teachers salary should be based on their student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
... on their students academic perfomance. Ive plenty of reasons to support my claim. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: Try to
...n how the students will get good score. Try and fail scheme will be obsolete, no one wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... This will break society apart, same as economical status there will be heirarchy of educa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...n students perfomance will do more harm then good. Although Im not completely ignori...
^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...e will do more harm then good. Although Im not completely ignoring the fact that i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08483290488 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67149913596 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54498714653 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5452447705 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.1904761905 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.38095238095 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199169667828 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709331408673 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103153066594 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127111989461 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825191755849 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.