The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to
2030
The chart illustrates the sum of fuel used in terms of four countries with high demands, and predictions of oil consumption up to the year of 2030.
Overall, from 2009 to 2015, China and the Middle East had their sales rate increased, whereas the Western Europe and Japan declined, and the US stayed the same. It is also predicted that daily oil consumption in the US and Western Europe and Japan will decrease sharply. Meanwhile, the figures of China and the Middle East will rise up significantly after 15 years.
In 2009, the US had the highest demand for fuel, where they consumed almost 10 million barrels every day. On the contrary, the Middle East and China only used under 2 million barrels. Also, less than 4 million barrels was used in Western Europe and Japan. After 6 years, the consumption of oil rose around to 2 million for the Middle East and 3 million barrels for China. However, for Western Europe and Japan, they considerable declined to the exact number of barrels that China had rose to, which was 3 million barrels a day in 2015. The amount of fuel the United States consumed stayed the same.
One the one hand, it is predicted the importance of fuel to the US will decrease in the next 15 years, which it could fell to approximately 4 million barrels. The same for Western Europe and Japan, it is also forecasted the favorable in using fuel could decrease about 1 million barrels. On the other hand, it is estimated that the Middle East and China will rise up in the consumption of oil, from under 2 million to 3 million in the period of 2009 and 2030 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-05 | hoathubanh | 56 | view |
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005. 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spendtheir free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking? 61
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59440559441 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47145174835 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43006993007 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6522550147 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104960577309 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047905511545 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312356112269 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730592570308 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111230806492 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.