The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels such as gas, oil, and coal. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion.
Since the decades, environment is facing detrimental effects due to usage of fossil fuel (gas and oil). The entire world is sharing the atmosphere that is air and water. Environmental pollution caused by one country will alternatively effect the other. I strongly agree with the notion that international community must act for this cause considering pollution impacts each country and no country will take initiative itself due to economic impacts of such initiatives. This essay will demonstrate these ideas in detail.
To start with, pollution of each country impacts other as well. For instance excessive plastic bags and then dumped in Arabian Sea will consequently pollute Indian Ocean and will effect India, Iran and Oman who are sharing the ocean. Similarly, pollution from China's coal powered plants and steel mills impacts environment of Japan in adverse ways and deplete Ozone layer of other countries. Thus, it is agreed that water and air can not be divided in nations. Therefore, international community must take the charge and restrict countries to decrease their fossil fuel consumption to address the issue.
Moreover, world has changed into global village where countries compete with each other to manufacture cheap products. Admittedly, other options to use in replace of fossil fuel are expensive and will increase the price of goods, as a result countries will loose competitive edge. Seen in this light, it is believed that international community is a platform upon where countries will be restricted for consumption of fossil fuel.
To conclude, industrialisation across the globe has produced deleterious effects on environment. Natural resources in atmosphere can not be separated country wise and countries will not move for expensive options for the purpose of production. Hence, it becomes the responsibility of International community to take countries on board to minimise the use of fossil fuel.
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 56
- Some people say that Olympic games are not relevant in 21st century Do you agree or disagree 79
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive 89
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think money is the best gift to give to youngsters, while others disagree. Discuss both view and give you opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...aused by one country will alternatively effect the other. I strongly agree with the no...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...sequently pollute Indian Ocean and will effect India, Iran and Oman who are sharing th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fuel consumption to address the issue. Moreover, world has changed into global ...
^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ce of goods, as a result countries will loose competitive edge. Seen in this light, i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard to minimise the use of fossil fuel.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44186046512 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95815416115 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3868355776 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226350193694 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078553205317 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749684883535 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14865974093 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313807819984 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.