the natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problem does it cause? How can we slove these problems?
The environment issues caused by human beings are increasingly serious. One emerging problem is that we are cosuming too many natural resources that the earth could not take longer. This essay will present some significant consequences it brings and provide creative potential solutions.
In terms of negative results, one that should not be underestimated would be the shortage of natural resources. Most of those resources, such as oil and forests require hundreds of years to be reproduced, while the population of humans is increasingly rising, asking for more and more resources. As a result, it is predictable that the nature will no longer be capable of offering sufficient resources to us in the short future. Based on this, another consequence would be all living creatures are threatened by the lack of some certain resources. For example, fresh water is an important component of our life. Without fresh water, food can not be cooked, plants can not grow, products can not be manufactured. Fresh water is the fundamental base of our society. Therefore, if we continue consuming too many natural resources, we might threaten our own life in turn.
However, problems are still possible to be tackled. Firstly, taxes could be directed to invest science so that man made resources could replace natural ones in the future. For example, more and more new technologies and fresh materials are introduced to our life. In the poast, houses were built by woods, requiring a big amount of trees. Nowadays we are able to construct buildings with concret and other materials, thanks to the development of science. Secondly, resources that can be produced fastly and gained easily should be implemented to more fields. Coastal cities could take advantage of strong winds to produce electricity. The power of sun should also be fully developed which might be a potential choice to tak place oil. Furthermore, global collaboration is essential to tackle environment problems. It is a common sense that the lack of natrual resources is not one country or some certain countries' issue, it is a world-wide emergency that needs all humans to work together.
In conclusion, oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed in a extremely fast speed. This essay demonstrated two consequences this issue leaded to and discussed three practical methods to solve it.
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialize with people in their local communities Do you think it has more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Today many young people change their jobs or careers every few years What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 91
- Nowadays people are living in a "thrown-away" society where they use things for a short time and then throw away. What cause this and what problem it may lead to? 73
- Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg. internet or TV), do you agree or disagree? 84
- The range and quality of food have changed because of technological and scientific advances. Some people think the range and quality of food have improved, while others think these changes would be harmful. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s and fresh water are being consumed in a extremely fast speed. This essay demons...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 13.1623246493 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1832460733 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87214174664 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2741681251 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0869565217 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6086956522 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287306247271 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783692019082 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652894695619 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168440400269 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441313617632 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.