The pie charts depict the different sources for generating revenue as well as the expenditures of a children's charity for a duration of one year.
To begin with, the maximum budget required by the charity was collected from the food donated by the philanthropists which contributed to about 86.6% of the total revenue generated during that year. The second major source was the contributions done by various individuals working in the community which amounted to 10.4% of the total income. The program revenue followed this trend at 2.2%. The investment income, government grants, and other income were insignificant sources of revenue, contributing to only 0.8% combined.
On the other hand, most costs incurred by the charity were in the program services at 95.8% of the total expenditure. The fundraising and management and general cost were very less contributing to only 2.6% and 1.6% of the charity outgoings.
Thus, it can be clearly observed that most of the sum of money received by the charity was in the form of donated food. On the contrary, the majority of income that was spent by the charity was for the program services.
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- In June 1996, an experimental flu vaccine was trialled in a large country town on females only.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment Do you agree or disagree with this view 82
- ISSUETopic-It is often necessary even desirable for the political leaders to withhold some information from the public. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...am revenue followed this trend at 2.2%. The investment income, government grants, a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, thus, well, as for, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06349206349 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81905834404 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7506438503 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125277066479 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512407428029 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501642943854 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872552085419 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545213919221 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.