the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The graph demonstrates that how many goods are transported by using road, water, rail and pipelines modes in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, It is viewed that, a huge number of products was transported through road than other modes of transportation in the period of 28 years. By contrast, pipeline was considered the most unfavorable method over the period.
To begin, at the beginning in 1974, the quantities of goods transported by road stood at 70 million tonnes and reached to the highest amount that 100 million tonnes at the end of 2002 with a great fluctuation between 1978 and 1998. Whereas, the second highest was followed by the water transportation stood at below 40 in 1974 with a fluctuated- uplift till 1998. After that, there was a rapid rise and reached to 65 million tonnes.
The numbers of good transported by rail and pipelines were standing at 40 and 5 respectively. The goods transported by the pipeline experienced a steady climb up to late 1994. After that, the graph went in a plateau until the end of period. The quantity of goods transported by the rails was 40 million tonnes in 1974 and it witnessed a fluctuation movement under 40. But there is a slight increment at the end of year.
- The gap between rich and poor is growing. What problems does this create? What can be done to tackle them.It is undeniable that a remarkable difference is enormously increasing between the lifestyles of rich and poor class of people.It has created a lot o 56
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at l 74
- Advertisement brings many negative effect on people and the society. What are these problem? How to solve this problems? 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 56
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time. In there opinion children should only read serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The graph demonstrates that how much goods are transported by using road, wa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...reat fluctuation between 1978 and 1998. Where as, the second highest was followed by the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...were standing at 40 and 5 respectively. the goods transported by the pipeline exper...
^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...t in a plateau until the end of period. the quantity of goods transported by the ra...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71162790698 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78912358708 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520930232558 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0294227737 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327214017443 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122133597867 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999778283509 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217810356367 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803255615615 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.