People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that many goods in present are considerably priced and can be easily purchased. However, there are more cons than pros in buying cheap products.
One the one hand, there are many reasons for purchasers not to buy inexpensive products. Firstly, nowadays, consumers can literally find a dupe of everything online, from technologies, clothing, to everyday-used objects. However, the quality of those goods is not guaranteed. A year ago, my uncle bought a fake phone battery for only $3, while the legit one would cost around $100. It was only usable for around 2 months before it exploded while charging. Secondly, from the point of view of the manufacturers, the cheap products can affect their brands dramatically if all consumers only care about the price and it would also create a more competitive field in business. My family’s company fell sharply due to the effects of the cheap and low quality products in the market.
On the other hand, considerably priced products can be helpful to the lower class workers. While they cannot afford the high-ends stuffs, those workers can pay for a similar product in a much lower price. Also, it is possible for consumers to spend the same amount of money to buy a luxury good to purchase for a multiple of products at a lower cost. For example, instead of paying $5000 for a Louis Vuiton handbag, the money can be spent on 50 cheaper bags from Forever21.
In conclusion, even though people can purchase goods at a lower price, the drawbacks can outnumber the benefits for various of unfortunate things could happen due to their low qualities.
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a newcountry. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spendtheir free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to2030 56
- The chart below shows the process of making fruit cans. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cle bought a fake phone battery for only , while the legit one would cost around 0...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90808823529 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72883693302 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6378884242 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162646272833 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553889030478 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334726419361 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100148697342 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213500073358 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.