The chart below shows the percentage of films produced by 5 different countries in 3 years
The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of films production from 5 different countries between 2007 and 2009.
Overall, the percentages of film produced by country B, D and E increased in 3 years while that number of C fluctuated and A decreased over the same period. A was the country produced the highest percentage of film compared to others.
In 2007, the proportion of movies from A was the highest which accounted for precisely 80%. The figure then slightly dropped to about 78% in 2008 and 75% in 2009. Meanwhile, the number of movies produced by C was pretty low of 20% in 2007 then went up to about 22% in 2008 and ended up with nearly 19% in 2009.
On the other hand, the proportion of film produced by B rose up significantly year by year from approximately 34% in 2007 to 35% in 2008 and finally to 50% in 2009. D and E film production trends were similar to B with about 13% and 4% in 2007. The figures then gradually went up to 14% and 5% in 2008 and reached the peaks of almost 15% and 6% in 2009, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | NhatPhong | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | alicedoan1112 | 87 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 73
- The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010 46
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Marriages in America 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38860103627 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69495807042 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1174442185 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264856558154 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123801708669 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1235375481 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195102684266 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133374370446 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.