In today’s society, we can hear that many individuals cannot do their tasks well, or they make mistakes in doing it, for being so busy with various things. In my opinion, being responsible to do several tasks decreases the rate of work accuracy, and I support my idea with three conspicuous reasons- stressful condition, limit time working, and bounded time to update information- as follows.
Firstly, concentrating on various things makes individuals more anxious which consequently, decreases the brain performance drastically. With this rapid changes in societies, people have to be updated quickly. This situation puts them in a lot of mental tension, hence, they cannot easily focus on each of their duties. The more the task complex, the less task they do correctly. An example of this is my sister who is a Ph.D. student. She decided to take 3 courses in a term, simultaneously. This heavy workload made a lot of stress for her and prevented her to be in top three students.
Secondly, it is crystal clear that no one can work 24 hours per day, and everyone needs to have rest and leisure time. For this purpose, profit and non-profit companies have a specific time for their employers to do their duties. However, with the enhancement of complexity in our modern life, sometimes people have to stay at work to finish their tasks. Therefore, employers prefer to do their tasks rapidly with less concentration which decreases the rate of work accuracy. An example of this is my brother who bought a house with a loan. Since his salary was not affordable, he had to work in two separate companies. As expected, for he could not do his tasks properly, he got fired from the first company and his salary was declined, as a penalty of making critical mistakes, in the second company.
Moreover, we have a limited time in a day to learn new things. Individuals have to learn how to work with several new types of equipment in their specific field which occupies their time, considerably. In this condition, many of them cannot focus on other things well. Imagine a high-school student who wants to get a good grade to accept in a high-level university. He/she also wants to be a good music player in the high-school. He/she will achieve none of his/her goals if he/she wants to do both of these significant tasks together, for doing various things in the same time makes him so busy, which consequently, will not let him do his task well.
In conclusion, doing different things decreases people’s concentration and they cannot do all of their responsibilities well. The three aforementioned results support the statement with some examples.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time to update information- as follows. Firstly, concentrating on various things...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93986636971 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88320919694 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521158129176 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7316234905 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4166666667 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7083333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253556493658 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718075508248 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795419820704 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183670499809 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881485490275 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.