Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The article discusses that using electronical databases in the medical science has several advantages over traditional paper-based record keeping and should be several efforts to convince the doctors to adopt this method instead of former approach that is also using among doctors. The passage also provides three reasons and explanations to confirm its own claim. On the other hand, the professor on the lecture supports the opposite viewpoint and argument. She contradicts each of the three justifications presented on the article completely one by one to buttress her own debate.
First reason presented on the second paragraph of the article states that using electronical procedure can help to reduce the cost by saving money. Paper records require a great amount of money for process of their storage. The professor refutes the statement by indicating that even doctors who utilize electronical method are coerced to use paper records as their own backup. This method also consumes the same amount of money to store the paper records.
Second explanation displayed on the next piece of the passage posits that electronical medical records are vital for reducing of possibility of medical errors. Electronical processes are connected by statndardization of forms. The professore also invalidates this position by announcing that doctors should first examine the patients by pen and papers and then convert the informations on paper into electronical forms that this process can also increase errors.
Final justification represented on the last and forth section of the article areues that electronical medical records can help to medical research, by them it would be easier to extract the needed information from medical databases. The professor, in addition, discredits this argument by declaring that obtaining the informations related to patients is a very difficult process. All data associated to patients are under privacy laws that are very strict and access to this kind of informations needs the permission of the patients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- summarise the points made in the lecture. 3
- do you agree or disagree with following statement? it is important to know about events happening around the world, even it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Your former homestay family is coming to see you in your home country and stay from January 31st to February 10th.Write them a letter. In your letter:•Make plans to meet them at a convenient location•Specify a time and date•Suggest some activities y 11
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49050632911 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92419276053 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534810126582 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9628798601 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.928571429 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0099859051026 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00287613576274 0.0996497079465 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00704896062273 0.0662205650399 11% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00661849858173 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00661916042066 0.0443174109184 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.