The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. The data can be roughly divided into two groups, one involving teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment, and the other consisting of other workers’ salaries, and resources e.g. books.
As we can see from the first group, there was an increase in the expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment in the twenty years. Two decades witnessed a huge rise in the spending on insurance, increasing from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001, a fourfold rise. Meanwhile, the amount of money on teachers’ salaries went up to 45% from 40%. Also, the expense on furniture climbed to 23% from 15%, with a great dip at 5% in 1991. Although the money on teachers’ salaries was always far more than that on insurance, the latter reflected a greater growth rate.
However, the situation in the second group was just opposite. In other words, the amount of money on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books experienced a decrease over the period of twenty years, from 28% to 15% and from 15% to 9% respectively.
Overall, it is obvious from the charts that the quantities of money on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the three years while those on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend? 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., first, however, second, so, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09583333333 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01834380175 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7599384715 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132952786398 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634114707934 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118809816212 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888630031707 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825104790805 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.