Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the topical issue of advertisements has provoked a heated debate. Although contested fiercely by many, it is a widely held view that various publicity campaigns can be instrumental in preparing added budgets for schools. providing compiled statistics, I will entirely agree with this statement before presenting my lines of argument.
From the economic standpoint, students at educational establishments seem ideal potential customers for intentions of businesses, which assist with national financial prosperity. These immature members of society are more easily attracted to purchase certain commercial products, whereas it would be demanding to allure experienced adults into buying wide-ranging products. As a few notable examples, the billboard posters, colorful flyers, and special offers in academic places can be cited often by some. Hardly ever has any other proof attested to advertisement gimmicks.
Furthermore, without the slightest doubt, many corporations merely promote the sales of their product to provide excellent educational facilities, in that most of earned profit will be devoted commonly by sponsors to equipping classes and schools. Not only will educational centers profit from well-equipped laboratories or high-tech educational tools, but students also take advantage of more up-to-date equipment. The irrefutable and empirical evidence of this economic prosperity can primarily derive from the survey conducted in the Nordic countries in 2016, with establishing, if not substantiating a strong correlation between the gained money and improved levels of educational standard, not to mention enhanced educational performance.
To conclude, notwithstanding the possible threat of exploitation, the practice of launching advertising programs in schools can benefit society enormously. Thus, my main contention is that it is both favorable and productive as long as it is regulated and monitored actively by official authorities concerned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.State your opinion and support it with reasons an 77
- Should voting be compulsory for all citizens or people should have freedom to choose not to vote. What is your opinion? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.State your opinion and support it with reasons an 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Providing
...in preparing added budgets for schools. providing compiled statistics, I will entirely ag...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12903225806 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41553177771 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713261648746 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4971106447 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850577046602 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301686342809 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277081688376 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490078765182 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020629358226 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.57 11.5310837438 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.08 8.32886699507 145% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 55.0591133005 234% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.