When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge.
Which of these points of view do you agree with most? Support your argument with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
The implication of when computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. Scholars over a decade have agreed to this phenomenon with credible resources. I agree with the statement of how computers can do work more productively by providing goods and services, smarter and make a man happy these will be achieved by creating a pool of empirical evidence to support this topic before attaining a coherent inference.
At the outset, there are diverse approaches why computers are considered as vital but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that computers can do work faster than the personnel. Moreover, computers are running on command, so once command fed it automatically handles the work in big factories and hand-loom. For instance, food packaging industries machines run via command of computers, so less manpower consumption. Hence accuracy in work has a vital role to play in the above-mentioned topic.
Furthermore, it also has the capacity to providing goods and services faster and smarter rather than a human being. As an example, earlier time there were postmen who delivered posts at the stakeholder's home, now email can reach within a moment to the person and dealing can be possible via the medium of computer and internet.
Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that computers can do work faster, smarter and accurate than human manpower. it can be predicted that in the near future all work will be handled via computers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | Primace | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | 029ashish@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | ajayaryanone | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...omputers, so less manpower consumption. Hence accuracy in work has a vital role to pl...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...arter and accurate than human manpower. it can be predicted that in the near futur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16433566434 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85373168626 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611888111888 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.494695754 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259043374217 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859899312322 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132808261201 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138155799743 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124215392504 0.0609392437508 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.