The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree?
Vast amounts of money are invested by governments in attempts to discover extraterrestrial life. However, a number of people consider it useless and believe that more funding should be provided to tackle more vital issues instead. I am inclined to disagree with such an opinion, because space exploration may soon become not just useful, but critical.
First and foremost, finding other forms of life in the universe can ease the humanity’s understanding of itself. It can shed light upon, for instance, the origin of species, thus letting man alleviate many intercultural conflicts. More than that, discovery of living organisms outside the Earth can give insights into biological phenomena necessary to cure illnesses now deemed terminal.
Secondly, if researchers happened to discover another race of sentient beings, this would probably bring about a revolution on our planet with dramatic changes in numerous fields. We could, for example, learn other methods of food and energy production and construction of dwellings. This would help the humankind to conquer such problems as famine, land degradation and fossil fuels depletion.
Another idea which is undoubtedly connected with the investigation of extraterrestrial life is colonization of other planets. It may sound unrealistic, but according to many influential scientists and engineers, this could become inevitable due to excessive contamination and exploitation of the environment. As a social scientist Mayer Hillman said in an interview for “The Guardian”, even if the emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere were stopped today, we would not save the planet. Thus, the only solution is to evacuate.
All things considered, the exploration of space and, possibly, life in it is a wise and crucial activity. Even though it may be unclear to general public why they should sponsor something so expensive that does not produce immediate results, it seems to turn out the most important issue soon.
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits To what extent do you agree 57
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree? 90
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits. To what extent do you agree? 84
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Thus, the only solution is to evacuate. All things considered, the exploration o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ivity. Even though it may be unclear to general public why they should sponsor something so ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52287581699 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1092500063 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68954248366 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8525804979 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131625018444 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410790016171 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620363178221 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646708843666 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544564421311 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.